Western sidereal astrology chart

Fagan considered lunars—a chart for the monthly return of moon to its natal place—to be the best predictive instrument in an astrologer's toolkit. In this article, Fagan discusses the true origin of the zodiac symbols. He explains that the symbols and names of the twelve constellations were derived from monthly agricultural events that occurred in ancient Egypt.

In this article, Fagan continues his look at transiting planets. Here, he looks at the transits of Venus and Mars alone, and in combination with other planets, especially in the lunar return. He also discuses the meaning of these planets in the birth chart and in synastry. Fagan looks at the transits of Jupiter and Saturn alone, and in combination with other planets, He delves deeply into the intrinsic nature of these planets and discuses their meaning in the birth chart and in synastry.

The Ochchabhaga, February Fagan briefly discusses both the Hindu and Babylonian ayanamsas before examining the horoscope of Mohandas Gandhi. Over centuries, however, 50 seconds per year adds up to a sizable difference between Earth years and sidereal years footnote 5. So, the rate of change between the two zodiacs from the inception of the tropical zodiac when they were the same, has been about 0.

This phenomenon--the sidereal year being a little longer than the solar year --is known as the Precession of the Equinoxes. This term need not be intimidating. People not living on the Equator know these moments as the first day of Spring and Autumn. It seems like it is a matter involving space. But in the West our calendars are not linked to the sidereal year ; they are adjusted to the solar one. It is precession, then, or rather our different ways of handling it, which caused the existence of two zodiacs. One zodiac the tropical is linked to the solar year ; the other the sidereal , to the sidereal year.

But they do. Practical Differences The Sidereal Zodiac has origins which disappear in the mists of antiquity. Also called the Fixed zodiac, it aligns, and keeps aligned, each sign with the constellation from which it took its name. In factoring in precession, signs of sidereal astrology are tied to the sidereal year. Sidereal Aries has moved slowly backward relative to the Spring Equinox. In , sidereal 0 Aries occurred at p.

Western Sidereal Astrology Is A Sacred Science:

EST on April In , three hundred years later, sidereal 0 Aries occurred at p. Eastern Daylight Time on April 14, four calendar days later. So, on April 10, , the sidereal sun was at 26 Pisces. Tropical astrology, according to Cyril Fagan, originated among the Greeks over a period of several hundred years, being mostly systematized by the 1st century BC footnote 6. But it was left to Poseidonius, c. In basing its signs in the solar year, tropical astrology, therefore, disconnects the signs from the constellations from which they were derived.

The consequences of that cleavage did not occur overnight. It occurred slowly, accruing over centuries.

Uranus in the 5th House | Mystick Physick Blog

Now, about years later, each tropical sign is almost one whole sign ahead of its own constellation, but they have stayed linked with certain dates. EST on March Eastern Daylight Time. The date is the same.

Genius of the Sidereal Zodiac in Vedic Astrology

The time varies for a number of reasons. Notice the jump--in both--between and During that time our calendar must have undergone a non-standard change. After tropical 0 Aries occurs only around March How interesting and funny! Here, too, is the link to her site : Amber. At a. This is the same sun we all see. It is just regarded as in different places by the two zodiacs. The sidereal sun--speaking in terms of the order of the signs from Aries to Taurus to Pisces--is almost a whole sign behind the tropical one. Disagreement--not great--exists about exactly when the tropical and sidereal zodiacs coincided.

It sponsored two main, slightly different conversion factors for going from tropical to sidereal positions and vice versa. Since separation between zodiacs occurred in small increments over a long period of time, consequences of their divergence have been subtle. If an astrologer lived to age 70, additional separation between the zodiacs during his lifetime was only about 58 minutes and 20 seconds--not even a whole degree.

People cannot perceive such a slight difference with their senses. Why It Is Difficult to Evaluate the Difference Between Zodiacs Tradition and habit—inertia—in both systems, however, are not the only reasons impartial examination of tropical versus sidereal astrology has not occurred.

Another, major reason exists. Astrology everywhere appears to produce three main types of astrologers. One type consistently bases his astrology on principles of planets, houses, and signs. I suspect he is more left- than right-brained, and is more scientific. A second type is psychic, and might be considered more right- than left-brained. Looking at the chart he gets, from somewhere, information about the individual.

The third type is intuitive, and closer to right- and left-brained. He works with astrology as mandala, as pattern, but his inferences from it are based on astrological principles. His methods vary. He may be psychic. He may be intuitive.


  1. The Sidereal Zodiac in astrology, its strengths and weaknesses.
  2. Featured stories you may like.
  3. Free Sidereal Astrology – Western and Vedic Sidereal Astrology Readings Free Guide!.

He may be using astrological principles. He may believe he is using astrological principles.

What is the Zodiac?

He may also not be using them. He may or may not be able to make intelligible--that is, truly acceptable—to other astrologers his reasons for the interpretations which, over time, led to his successful career as an astrologer. This little fact, that it is our astrology which ultimately sponsors our success, does not just apply to astrologers. It applies to every one.

http://gohu-takarabune.com/policy/localizar/se-como-localizar-mi.php But it is not possible to know that is true until you have an astrological method which "exposes" that fact. This one does, without exception, and there are many examples in papers throughout this site. Traditional astrology-- birth charts using either Eastern or Western zodiacs--does not. The conception chart has to be added to the birth see Method and Home Page, links at bottom. He exists in both systems, sidereal and tropical. Indeed, his type is represented in all categories of fortune-telling as well as all areas of success. This fact, that it is possible to be a successful, even a very successful, practicing astrologer using either system is the suspicious fact.

Featured stories you may like

Any scientist would consider it an odd fact, embarrassing and requiring investigation. And any astrologer who interacts with his astrology in terms of at least hoping to arrive at measuring classes of conditions and events such that they produce statistical significance, should also find it, if not embarrassing, at least troubling. They have been doing it for centuries. I do not know how sidereal astrologers in sidereal countries respond about tropical astrology, but tropical astrologers of the West, when confronted with the existence of both zodiacs, almost always have the same response.

Each tradition has gifted astrologers. Each has brilliant ones. A simple story will have to serve as my minor example of this phenomenon. Astrologers rarely comment on other astrologer's results in print. Using astrological principles, the former simply could not figure out how the latter had been successful in predicting that third marriage. Well, the third marriage, indeed, occurred.

By sound I mean that they would be such that almost all astrologers would agree that when they occur they imply a marriage or close relationship. Whatever her reasoning, she was bound to come up with the right prediction as long as her own chart was not temporarily afflicted at the time. One way to put this is that her astrology represents a "union card" from the universe for just such success. This has nothing to do with work.